Ads for coaches, courses and consultants.
Webinar funnels live on hook testing, and Meta rejects income claims and "are you struggling with" openers. Tadka turns one portrait and one offer into a week of hook variations, testimonial cards and a LinkedIn-sized set, checks the wording against the income-claim and personal-attribute rules, and shows you which hook is winning.
Made for ready to change something. Generated in Tadka for Rise Practice, shown as generated.
They buy the person before they buy the programme.
A face and a specific outcome beat a feature list, and an earnings figure gets the ad rejected. The set leads with you, the room, and the work.
One brief on Monday. The week, placed.
Six pieces from one answer, each drawn where it lands. The Meta ad set publishes from Tadka, created paused; the rest are handed to you as image and caption.
Saturday. A testimonial card. Lands in Review card.
Type what you would say. The ads come back.
These are lines the studio suggests for coaches, courses and consultants. Say it your way in the studio and the set comes back in your colours, at every size.
Free workshop Thursday: how I priced my first retainer.
Type what you would write. Watch what gets caught.
The same check that runs under every brief in the studio. It knows the words that get coaches, courses and consultants ads rejected, says why, and offers the line that passes. No special category needed when you publish to Meta from Tadka.
Tadka flags guaranteed-income wording, earnings numbers and personal-attribute openers, and suggests allowed phrasing. Testimonial cards use the words you paste, never invented reviews. It flags common issues; it is not a legal review.
Make $10kPromised earnings and multiples count as unrealistic outcomes in Meta's deceptive content rules.
Instead: Show what the product does and let a real, typical customer result speak; no guarantees, no multiples.
Meta Advertising Standards: Deceptive content and unrealistic outcomesQuit your jobPromised earnings and multiples count as unrealistic outcomes in Meta's deceptive content rules.
Instead: Show what the product does and let a real, typical customer result speak; no guarantees, no multiples.
Meta Advertising Standards: Deceptive content and unrealistic outcomes
This flags common issues before the platform does. It is not a legal review, and in the studio it never blocks a run.
The week without this.
Nothing here is a guess. It is what coaches, courses and consultants tell us the week actually costs.
What it costs.
Images and templates, with your library.
Plus Meta publishing, campaigns and the results loop.
More volume, and more channels as they ship.
Every account starts with five free credits, no card. Every run shows its price before you click, a failed run returns its credits, and unused credits are held for 90 days if you pause.
Questions we get.
Can it write income claims if I have proof?
It flags them and suggests wording Meta allows. Even documented earnings claims are routinely rejected, so the safer angle is the method, the time saved or a specific outcome without a dollar figure.
Does it invent testimonials?
No. Testimonial cards render text you paste. The review card in Your Week asks for reviews; it does not write them.
Which sizes do I get?
Feed 4:5, story 9:16, square and the LinkedIn 1.91:1 link size in one run.
Your first 5 ads are free.
Open the studio and the coaches, courses and consultants pack is already loaded: the audiences, the sizes, the rules, and a brief to start from. No card, and nothing is made or published until you say so.
- 5free ads to start. No card.
- $9a month after that, for 60 credits and your whole library.
- 3credits made the ads on this page for Rise Practice. Every run shows its price first.